ADAPTABILITY OF SECURITIZATION MODEL TO CONDITIONS OF VOLATILE FINANCIAL STRUCTURE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/eoik-2021-0012Keywords:
Securitization, Standardization, Credit Improvement, Systemic Risk, Non-Performing Loans, Bank Restructuring, Financial StabilityAbstract
The Great Financial Crisis of 2008 exposed certain weaknesses in the field of investment banking and the necessity to adapt certain innovative solutions to the newly created economic and financial environment. The process of securitization is a financial innovation, which some financial analysts consider one of the causes of the Great Financial Crisis. Although it is often linked to the emergence of the Great Financial Crisis, the advantages of the securitization model, together with a level of adaptability and enhanced process control throughout all procedural levels, significantly outweigh its perceived shortcomings.
The financial system of the Republic of Srpska continues to be characterized by the growth of nonperforming loans in bank assets, mainly caused by increased systemic risk due to the current COVID-19 pandemic and declining economic activity in the country, but also by a well-developed financial system infrastructure, which is necessary in order to allow the application of the securitization model to significantly contribute to increasing financial stability in the conditions of volatile financial structure. The model of securitization of nonperforming loans and its application in the process of bank restructuring can be the mainstay of the stabilization of the financial system. The aim of the research is to demonstrate that the application of the adapted securitization model of nonperforming assets of banks and its application in the process of bank restructuring in the conditions of unstable financial structure may contribute to financial stability and control of increase of a systemic risk.
Securitization increases the supply of quality financial instruments, the number of participants in the process of transformation of financial assets and develops a more resilient financial market. The results include emergence of additional funding sources for financial institutions, generation of nonperforming assets’ problems, with additional liquidity and diversification for many of their clients.
References
Arthurcox. (2017). Securitisation Reform: Agreement reached. Retrieved from http://www.arthurcox.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Arthur_Cox_SecuritisationReform-Agreement-reached.pdf
Bašić, D., & Plakalović, N. (2019). Mortgage financial market and securitization mechanisms. Banja Luka: Faculty of Economics, University of Banja Luka.
Climate Bonds Initiative. (2018). Bonds and Climate Change The State of The Market 2018. Retrieved from https://www.climatebonds.net/fles/reports/cbi_sotm_2018_fnal_01h-web.pdf
Cardone-Riportella, C., Samaniego-Medina R., & Trujillo-Ponce, A. (2010). What drives bank securitisation? The Spanish experience. Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol. 34 (11), 2639-2651, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfn.2010.05.003
Deloitee. (2016) Italian non-performing loan. State guarantee and securitisation scheme... Unlocking the NPL log-jam? Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/uk/Documents/corporate-finance/deloitte-uk-fa-italian-nonperforming-loans.pdf
Delivorias, A. (2016). Understanding Securitization (Background - benefits - risks). European Parliamentary Research Service, 1-24, doi: 10.2861 / 788633
Erić, D. D. (2003). Finansijska tržišta i instrumenti (eng. Financial markets and instruments). II amended edition. Belgrade: Čigora Press.
Fell, J., Moldovan, C. & O’Brien, E. (2017). Resolving non-performing loans: a role for securitization and other financial structures? Financial Stability Review, 158-174. Retrieved from https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/fsr/art/ecb.fsrart201705_03.en.pdf?914a0eb2f9b52060b52c82e12afa1a05
Kovaleva, T. M., Khvostenko, O. A., Glukhova, A. G., & Mozharovsky, E. V. (2018). The Actual Problems of Assets Securitization in Commercial Organizations. Revista Espacios.,Vol. 39 (Nº22), 28-43, Retrieved from https://www.revistaespacios.com/a18v39n22/a18v39n22p28.pdf
Kara, A., Marques-Ibanez, D., & Ongena, S. (2017). Securitization and credit quality. ECB Working Paper Series, 2009, 1-41, doi: 10.2866 / 696711
Nemlioglu, I. (2019). (2019). A novelty on unlocking businesses’ potential growth: Intellectual Property Securitisation.Procedia Computer Science,158, 999–1010, doi: 10.1016/2019.09.141
Vasilevna Nikolova, Lj., Grigorievich Rodionov, D., & Bahauovna Mottaeva, A. (2016). Securitization of Bank Assets as a Source of Financing the Innovation Activity. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(S2), 246-252. Retrieved from https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijef/article/view/2559/pdf
Warner, J. & Boas, I. (2019). Securitization of climate change: How invoking global dangers for instrumental ends can backfire, Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 37(8), 1472-1488, doi: 10.1177/2399654419834018
Živkov, D., & Pavkov, I. (2012). Predimenzioniranje subprimarnog hipotekarnog tržišta kao glavni uzrok njegovog sloma. (eng. Oversizing the Subprimary Mortgage Market as the Main Cause of its Collapse.) School of Business, 3, 58-64, doi: 10.5937/skolbiz1203058Z
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Oikos Institute - Research Centre
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
